ST Alpha - "But you're right, it's obviously better to get 538's spin as opposed to going to the primary source document. Good point. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 165

In response to "You obviously didn't read the article. -- nm" by Don Homer

But you're right, it's obviously better to get 538's spin as opposed to going to the primary source document. Good point. -- nm

Posted by Strongbad (aka Rambler14) Mar 30 '11, 10:35

(No message)

Responses:

Your criticism was "single point analysis" which it isn't. If you disagree that it's bad for the GOP, that's cool, but the analysis relies on 15 - TWuG Mar 30, 10:37 9
- Your linked CNN Poll showed 1 data point of decline. - Strongbad Mar 30, 10:40 8
  - Did you read the link in the IM that goes to the Nate Silver article? I linked *both* for a reason. - TWuG Mar 30, 10:44 7
    - Nate's doing his usual leftist spin. Yes, I understand. - Strongbad Mar 30, 10:45 6
      - That's fine that you disagree with his conclusion. But his conclusion isn't based on single point analysis, which was your complaint in the first - TWuG Mar 30, 10:48 5
        
        Your subject "Tea Party favorability ratings are in decline" was clearly not supported by the linked article. - Strongbad Mar 30, 10:50 4
        
        There hasn't been a change from 38 to 32 in their favorability ratings since December? - Will Hunting Mar 30, 10:51 3
        
        Which is the definition of "single data point conclusion" -- nm - Strongbad Mar 30, 10:52 2
        
        yet that article was linked and it clearly was supporting the statement. - Will Hunting Mar 30, 10:54 1
        
        Yes, I should have read both. - Strongbad Mar 30, 10:59

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.