ST Alpha - "Your subject "Tea Party favorability ratings are in decline" was clearly not supported by the linked article." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 165

In response to "That's fine that you disagree with his conclusion. But his conclusion isn't based on single point analysis, which was your complaint in the first " by TWuG

Your subject "Tea Party favorability ratings are in decline" was clearly not supported by the linked article.

Posted by Strongbad (aka Rambler14) Mar 30 '11, 10:50

I admit, I should have read both articles before posting the 1st reply.

Responses:

There hasn't been a change from 38 to 32 in their favorability ratings since December? - Will Hunting Mar 30, 10:51 3
- Which is the definition of "single data point conclusion" -- nm - Strongbad Mar 30, 10:52 2
  - yet that article was linked and it clearly was supporting the statement. - Will Hunting Mar 30, 10:54 1
    - Yes, I should have read both. - Strongbad Mar 30, 10:59

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.