Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 167
For Dawson, Jim and Ender, I went and found the whole (unedited) Ed Schultz piece. Let's say the editing was significant.
Posted by
pmb (aka pmb)
Mar 30 '11, 12:04
It's really about the Republican hypocrisy for not supporting the president on this. Basically if Bush was saying the same things Obama said, Republicans would be up in arms about anybody not supporting the action.
Here's the whole thing.
(www.msnbc.msn.com)
Responses:
even I can't take Shultz seriously.
-
Mel Profit
Mar 30, 12:35
1
Honestly I've never watched the guy. I know nothing about him. It's just that it was being pointed to as evidence of Democrat hypocrisy and I wanted
-
pmb
Mar 30, 12:40
[deleted]
newsbusters, editing dishonestly? Noooo, -- nm
-
Reagen
Mar 30, 12:13
Considering the source, I'm not at all surprised. -- nm
-
znufrii
Mar 30, 12:09
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.