ST Alpha - "in WI they don't, it's nominally nonpartisan." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "I think it's ridiculous as well. It also strikes me as bizarre that they run under a party banner. -- nm" by pmb

in WI they don't, it's nominally nonpartisan.

Posted by znufrii Apr 6 '11, 08:47

but for some reason this race has become a referendum on the Republican takeover of the statehouse.

Responses:

For some reason? Maybe because Prosser said he supported Walker? -- nm - mara Apr 6, 08:55 9
- No, I'm wrong. It wasn't Prosser, it was his campaign manager. And he didn't say he supported Walker, he said Prosser was a "complement" to Walker. -- nm - mara Apr 6, 09:01 8
  - Close enough. Get the pitchforks and torches! -- nm - Dr.Vermin Apr 6, 09:03 7
    - Sounds reasonable. Judges aren't supposed to be compliments to politicians. - Will Hunting Apr 6, 09:06 6
      - except that's not the reason why. - znufrii Apr 6, 09:10 4
        
        He's losing cuz there needs to be a target. But actually having part of your team say something so stupid doesn't help -- nm - Will Hunting Apr 6, 09:13 3
        
        precisely - znufrii Apr 6, 09:14 2
        
        Actually, he's losing by a couple hundred. -- nm - Will Hunting Apr 6, 09:16
        
        n/m, just looked at the updated vote counts. -- nm - znufrii Apr 6, 09:15
      - I think the number of elected positions in the US is ... something. Overwhelming. Unwieldy. -- nm - Beryllium (iPhone) Apr 6, 09:10

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.