Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 156
In response to
"
my problem is more from a labour standpoint. you set a cap at a level attainable for all teams, and you have the yankees and red sox (who I presume
"
by
mafic
And I think that's the point: it won't change small market spending, and will force Steinbrenner and Henry to keep more money.
Posted by
TFox
Dec 30 '08, 09:23
There, the sport is fixed.
Responses:
It won't and it will -
-
Reagen
Dec 30, 09:27
[deleted]
4
move their teams to Minneapolis or Seattle and see how much money they put back into the game -- nm
-
pigby
Dec 30, 09:30
as opposed to, say, lowering ticket prices? -- nm
-
mafic
Dec 30, 09:29
2
[deleted]
1
I have no problem charging (and paying) what the market demands, but let's not pretend they're doing it to give back to the game somehow.
-
mafic
Dec 30, 09:39
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.