Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 157
In response to
"
you're trying to prove that shorts get picked more, yes? -- nm
"
by
loosilu
no, I think he's trying to prove that talls don't get pickpocketed at all. If he can prove that, several other related facts are proven as well.
Posted by
Beryllium (aka grayman)
Apr 13 '11, 13:59
But even one single exception shoots down the theory. :)
Responses:
it's meaningless unless they get picked at a different rate than shorts. -- nm
-
loosilu
Apr 13, 14:00
2
The concept of pickpocketing exists. Someone has been pickpocketed. If no tall has been pickpocketed, only shorts get pickpocketed. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Apr 13, 14:01
1
It just makes perfect sense.
-
Spawn
Apr 13, 14:01
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.