ST Alpha - "Unsure. Thinking no? But I have no good reason. Natural Born Citizen does need to be *defined* however. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to "Somewhat related to birthers. Would you support a Constitutional amendment to remove the "natural born" citizen requirement for President? -- nm" by Dano

Unsure. Thinking no? But I have no good reason. Natural Born Citizen does need to be defined however. -- nm

Posted by ty97 May 8 '11, 18:57

(No message)

Responses:

I think it's been defined. -- nm - loosilu May 8, 18:58 3
- I have not read this whole thing, as it's obscenely long, but just browsing shows there are open questions -- (link) - ty97 May 8, 19:02 2
  - Thanks for this. I didn't know. -- nm - loosilu May 8, 19:03 1
    - I was surprised to learn about it during birther 2.0 as well. -- nm - ty97 May 8, 19:06

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.