ST Alpha - "I've seen it done on shoots. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "see wiki. It was done to the photos. A similar tool can also be used for make up, but that's a different thing. -- (link)" by loosilu

I've seen it done on shoots. -- nm

Posted by Reagen (aka Reagen) Jan 2 '09, 13:16

(No message)

Responses:

I have no doubt that there was a lot of caked-on makeup in the shoot. But most of the plastic look is, by necessity, from Photoshop itself - Beryllium Jan 2, 13:18 5
- there is *serious* PS work on that photo, well beyond just the skin. -- nm - loosilu Jan 2, 13:19 4
  - you mean suckers don't throw off starbursts? -- nm - Reagen Jan 2, 13:19 2
    - What kind of boring suckers have YOU been buying? -- nm - Beryllium Jan 2, 13:23
    - I'm talking structural changes to her face. -- nm - loosilu Jan 2, 13:20
  - Epic word. -- nm - Beryllium Jan 2, 13:19
oh, I totally believe you. I'm just saying it's totally different from photo retouching. -- nm - loosilu Jan 2, 13:17 2
- yes, I know. And the "poreless" look is usually from makeup. -- nm - Reagen Jan 2, 13:19 1
  - from what I have read they do both. -- nm - loosilu Jan 2, 13:19

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.