ST Alpha - "Yup, it's called, "SEC voter bias". " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "USC is like early 1990s Florida State. They always find a way to not win a title but still get a top 5 ranking. -- nm" by David

Yup, it's called, "SEC voter bias".

Posted by musubi Jan 2 '09, 22:45

*shrug* I don't care about mythical national titles. Till they're settled on the field, they're less important than Rose Bowl Championships.

Responses:

Usc and Florida would have been an intrguing matchup this year -- nm - eag Jan 2, 22:50 3
- Certainly would have been. - musubi Jan 2, 22:56 2
  - Florida may be the only team that I think could have given the trojans a game or beaten them -- nm - eag Jan 2, 23:00 1
    - Till someone actually beats Utah, I'm not willing to say anyone (even the Trojans) are better. (nm) - musubi Jan 2, 23:03
aka the Beat Oregon State, Oregon and Stanford and there would be no need for crying. -- nm - David Jan 2, 22:49 5
- Who's crying? I'm celebrating 3 consecutive Rose Bowl wins. - musubi Jan 2, 22:50 4
  - Beating the second best Big 10 team the last couple of years was better than a national title? - David Jan 2, 22:55 3
    - Meh. National titles are nice, but they're mere icing on cake, not real substance. - musubi Jan 2, 22:59 2
      - Ohio State didn't go to the Rose Bowl the last two years because they were in the title game instead. That's what I meant. -- nm - David Jan 2, 23:03 1
        
        Yes, but this season when they were supposed to be just as good, USC man-handled them. - musubi Jan 2, 23:06

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.