Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 155
In response to
"
Cause it was Christian? -- nm
"
by
lileve
the opposite -- nm
Posted by
Roger More (aka RogerMore)
Jan 3 '09, 16:26
(No message)
Responses:
people were down on it because it wasn't christian enough? -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jan 3, 16:29
7
(spoils)
-
Roger More
Jan 3, 16:34
1
And yet the lead villain is Catholic in real life. -- nm
-
lileve
Jan 3, 16:51
The books had anti-God undercurrents... I don't think they were in the movie. -- nm
-
secretslacker
Jan 3, 16:31
4
hrm. I'd only ever heard the series held up as a pro-christian one. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jan 3, 16:36
3
Um... no, quite the opposite. If Christians were reading it, it was to keep an eye on 'the devil" :) -- nm
-
secretslacker
Jan 3, 16:43
the Narnia books by CS Lewis certainly -- nm
-
Roger More
Jan 3, 16:40
1
oh, crap, that's w hat I did. I mixed up Golden Compass with Prince Caspian. :) -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jan 3, 17:35
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
