ST Alpha - "No, it's been constantly dismissed as quack science for a decade. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 168

In response to "Go nuts? It's been a given hasn't it? -- nm" by lileve

No, it's been constantly dismissed as quack science for a decade. -- nm

Posted by Beryllium (aka grayman) May 31 '11, 10:03

(No message)

Responses:

I wouldn't say that. Results have been characterized as inconclusive. Not at all quackish. -- nm - loosilu May 31, 10:03 5
- it's non-ionizing radiation. There shouldn't be risk. -- nm - Reagen May 31, 10:19 4
  - isn't radar non-ionizing as well? Microwave, too? -- nm - Beryllium May 31, 10:50 1
    - (I believe both of them have documented ill effects for us fleshbags, although usually only in high doses) -- nm - Beryllium May 31, 10:51
  - and Titanic shouldn't have needed those life boats. - loosilu May 31, 10:25 1
    - Keep the ice cubes in your Diet Coke to a managable size. -- nm - Dr.Vermin May 31, 10:48

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.