Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 30, 15:54
2: Nov 30, 09:41
3: Nov 29, 16:44
4: Nov 29, 08:01
5: Nov 28, 16:19
6: Nov 28, 09:42
7: Nov 27, 18:07
8: Nov 27, 12:04
9: Nov 27, 08:26
10: Nov 26, 18:06
11: Nov 26, 12:05
12: Nov 26, 08:29
13: Nov 25, 18:33
14: Nov 25, 11:12
15: Nov 25, 07:08
16: Nov 24, 13:17
17: Nov 23, 18:13
18: Nov 23, 06:17
19: Nov 22, 13:24
20: Nov 22, 09:09
Posts: 161
In response to
"
I'd get the WD Black. -- nm
"
by
lileve
that is what I keep thinking, but I just wonder if the upgrade in price is worth it really for a media server. -- nm
Posted by
tRuMaN (aka Truman)
May 31 '11, 12:51
(No message)
Responses:
a friend mentions that Lower RPM generally means less heat and greater longevity. My two Greens have had decent, but not stellar, longevity.
-
Beryllium
May 31, 12:53
12
i have two Blues now. I get some stuttering at times when streaming video
-
tRuMaN
May 31, 12:55
11
I will say that I have a WD Black as my primary drive in my Windows machine and I love it. My media drives are whatever Seagate
-
oblique
May 31, 12:57
I can't remember what I put in my Mac Pro. I think it's a black, I was going for a green though. -- nm
-
lileve
May 31, 12:57
I wouldn't use Windows as a server for the most part, but if I did, I would run the OS on an SSD and only store the served data on HDs. -- nm
-
Beryllium
May 31, 12:56
8
its basically a modified version of server 03
-
tRuMaN
May 31, 13:00
6
I wasn't trying to knock the choice, I was just trying to suggest another angle of attack for possible lag/weirdness issues :) -- nm
-
Beryllium
May 31, 13:03
5
oh i know what is causing the lag. and really it streams fine
-
tRuMaN
May 31, 13:05
1
There's probably a performance-tracking service you could run on it to see how well it handles the load. -- nm
-
Beryllium
May 31, 13:06
SSD but who wants to pay those prices. -- nm
-
lileve
May 31, 13:04
2
Since it would only be used for the OS code, it doesn't have to be a big one -- nm
-
Beryllium
May 31, 13:04
1
How big are OS's these days? I have no clue. -- nm
-
lileve
May 31, 13:05
Oddly, my WD Black was as highly rated as an SSD when it came to speed/performance but not nearly as expensive -- nm
-
oblique
May 31, 12:58
Wouldn't you want a high rpm for streaming media? The cache is what might be over kill. IDK? -- nm
-
lileve
May 31, 12:53
6
Even on gigabit networking, you will *never* saturate the bandwidth of the hard drive's top speed.
-
Beryllium
May 31, 12:54
2
Yes. -- nm
-
lileve
May 31, 12:56
yeah, and my network is gigabit mostly. -- nm
-
tRuMaN
May 31, 12:55
i asked that earlier, cause I was reading an article that debated that point. Bery and Kilbo disagreed with each other. -- nm
-
tRuMaN
May 31, 12:53
2
I lost track of the thread. My point was basically that unless you're streaming to multiple clients or doing multiple read/write operations to
-
oblique
May 31, 12:56
I don't think their drives ever stop working. That might be part of it. -- nm
-
lileve
May 31, 12:55
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.