Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 160
In response to
"
Any particular reason? Doesn't seem wise with a pending IPO. -- nm
"
by
TWuG
my guess: There was no limit on orders, ON saw the number coming in and flipped. -- nm
Posted by
loosilu (aka loosilu2)
Jun 6 '11, 12:50
(No message)
Responses:
Then that sounds like a bad business decision by ON. Set those limits *before* you make the offer. -- nm
-
TWuG
Jun 6, 12:52
2
haven't we discussed here before the issue of groupon limits? Some business owner wrote a blog complaining that they set no limits. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jun 6, 12:54
1
Then businesses are stupid to use them. Old Navy has been around awhile so they should know to do their due diligence.
-
TWuG
Jun 6, 12:56
I would imagine many never would have been used. (we don't have old navvy here.) -- nm
-
amanda
Jun 6, 12:51
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.