Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 11:23
2: Nov 30, 15:54
3: Nov 30, 09:41
4: Nov 29, 16:44
5: Nov 29, 08:01
6: Nov 28, 16:19
7: Nov 28, 09:42
8: Nov 27, 18:07
9: Nov 27, 12:04
10: Nov 27, 08:26
11: Nov 26, 18:06
12: Nov 26, 12:05
13: Nov 26, 08:29
14: Nov 25, 18:33
15: Nov 25, 11:12
16: Nov 25, 07:08
17: Nov 24, 13:17
18: Nov 23, 18:13
19: Nov 23, 06:17
20: Nov 22, 13:24
Posts: 161
In response to
"
Since it was a thread earlier...the one thing I hope didn't happen with any of this stuff...
"
by
Jim
Ugh. Why would they do that?
Posted by
znufrii
Jun 20 '11, 09:39
we destroyed an irreplacable piece of hollywood history just so you can have a scrap of it? I don't see the appeal at all.
Responses:
Why would they do it? To sell a gazillion packs of some kind of trading card advertising that you could own a swatch of Marilyn's subway dress.
-
Jim
Jun 20, 09:41
3
Yes, it was a rhetorical question.
-
znufrii
Jun 20, 09:41
2
they could cut a small piece from the hem underneath, and still keep the dress mostly intact.
-
groiny
Jun 20, 09:43
1
I still don't like it. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jun 20, 09:44
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.