Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 164
Dating site causes outrage by dumping 30,000 "ugly people" -- (link)
Posted by
Strongbad (aka Rambler14)
Jun 20 '11, 10:29
(No message)
The decision to reject 30,000 cost the company more than US$100,000 in refunds and Hodge sent a regretful email to the distressed dumpees.
(www.myfoxny.com)
Responses:
Well, it is only for the Beautiful People, after all. It's in the name.
-
JaxSean
Jun 20, 10:34
Or is it just a publicity stunt? -- (link)
-
mara
Jun 20, 10:33
4
"Look at meeee! We've been hacked" would seem like a shortsighted marketing strategy for a dot com. -- nm
-
con_carne
Jun 20, 10:39
1
... and their definition of beauty is only skin deep. What's more short sighted than that? -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jun 20, 10:41
If it is, it's working, cause I'm a lot more likely to visit, knowing that the weeded out a lot of the riffraff
-
prayformojo
Jun 20, 10:34
Yes, yes it is. Everything about that article reeked of publicity stunts. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jun 20, 10:34
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
