Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 154
The NY GOP added a clause that essentially says (not kidding) churches/non profits, etc. cannot be penalized for discriminating against gays
Posted by
MDH (aka MDH)
Jun 24 '11, 18:41
Go f*ck yourself GOP.
Responses:
I'm quite fine with this as a legal matter.
-
ReluctantCynic
Jun 24, 18:57
4
[deleted]
3
If a religious group is allowed to discriminate against gays it says so in their 'good' book then I'm going to insist they be allowed, NO, required to
-
zeitgeist
Jun 24, 19:15
1
As a theological argument, I support this.
-
ReluctantCynic
Jun 24, 19:21
*sniffs bait*
-
ReluctantCynic
Jun 24, 19:11
depeding on the specifics, I might be alright with that. like now I don't think you can penalize (for example) the catholic church for refusing to
-
mafic
Jun 24, 18:47
4
[deleted]
3
I'm not in support of a religiously-affiliated public hospital refusing visitation rights, btw.
-
ReluctantCynic
Jun 24, 19:18
2
[deleted]
1
Ahhhhh ... then I don't like it either. -- nm
-
ReluctantCynic
Jun 24, 19:22
[deleted]
1
Oh I agree, I just love how they had to throw that in there. -- nm
-
MDH
Jun 24, 18:47
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
