ST Alpha - "In this case, I actually see what I think he's trying to say. Yes, she was found guilty, so she is a criminal...but I think his point was more" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 160

In response to "it's always good when dane decides to bring the ruckus. -- nm" by TFox

In this case, I actually see what I think he's trying to say. Yes, she was found guilty, so she is a criminal...but I think his point was more

Posted by Jim (aka Jim) Jul 7 '11, 07:39

that she was acquitted of the murder...but she's still widely considered to be a child killer.

Responses:

here a charge of false statement would never be considdered in a mourder case - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 07:41 47
- By obstructing and lying, she corrupted the entire investigation. And if she truly didn't do it...then her actions basically allowed a killer to get - Jim Jul 7, 07:43 18
  - Why do you assume it was a murder and not accidental? -- nm - mara Jul 7, 07:45 16
    - You must have missed the post where I said I didn't know much about the case. - Jim Jul 7, 07:58
    - why is this important unless people want to play jury again on someone who was freed of this? -- nm - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 07:56 1
      - I was just asking Jim what his reasoning was. -- nm - mara Jul 7, 07:58
    - i think people rarely get their mouths duct taped shut accidentally. -- nm - TFox Jul 7, 07:46 12
      - I have this image of them taping her mouth shut to keep her quiet and then ignoring her while she plays by the pool. I mean, it's still "accidental" - Amy Jul 7, 07:57
      - I guess I assumed they were trying to make it look like a murder, but maybe that doesn't make sense, since they didn't then report it. -- nm - mara Jul 7, 07:48
      - could be post mortem. - loosilu Jul 7, 07:47 9
        
        Could be a lot of things, but you don't duct tape an accidental death for any reason that's not crazy. -- nm - Will Hunting Jul 7, 07:48 7
        
        c'mon, maybe you didn't want the soul to escape the body....nm - x Jul 7, 07:53 1
        
        *squeezes through your tear ducts* -- nm - Casper the Friendly Ghost Jul 7, 07:54
        
        I totally agree. But the medical examiner could not give a conclusive cause of death. - loosilu Jul 7, 07:49
        
        Oh, I never considered these people to be mentally healthy. -- nm - mara Jul 7, 07:49 3
        
        I never thought of them as it either...but nothing here screams to me a legal mentally ill - Will Hunting Jul 7, 07:51 2
        
        No, I didn't mean legally insane. Legally sane people do irrational things. -- nm - mara Jul 7, 07:54
        
        all logic points to a murder, not a drowning. But logic != evidence. - loosilu Jul 7, 07:53
        
        well, sure. there would be no point, as dead people don't scream, but sure. -- nm - TFox Jul 7, 07:48
  - true -- nm - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 07:44
- So, really, just lie to the cops...that's not important unless they can get the murder conviction. -- nm - Will Hunting Jul 7, 07:42 2
  - if she was charged with somthing lesser it would become more important - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 07:46
  - talk about wasting time. how much time/money was spent because of her lies? -- nm - loosilu Jul 7, 07:43
- how is it a waste of time? -- nm - loosilu Jul 7, 07:41 24
  - the sentence of the charge (the main charge) is way bigger then the sentence of the other - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 07:44 23
    - that's not at all the point. There was always the possibility that she would be found guilty of only some of the charges (as actually happened). - loosilu Jul 7, 07:46 7
      - sure here we require the state to start a curt process if the think they can win the main charge - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 07:50 6
        
        [deleted] 3
        
        there are a lot of differences pointing them out is part an explanation of why i have my oppinions this is requested constantly by posters - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 08:05 2
        
        [deleted] 1
        
        it not critizem it is information - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 08:12
        
        And I'm sure the prosecution here went into this thinking they had a loser. Are you kidding me? -- nm - Will Hunting Jul 7, 07:52
        
        with a trial of this size and visibility, it makes no sense to do multiple trials. -- nm - loosilu Jul 7, 07:51
    - [deleted] 14
      - better??? hard to judge is different but in this case it seems - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 07:47 13
        
        [deleted] 7
        
        life in prison versus one year is the overkill point -- nm - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 07:54 6
        
        [deleted] 5
        
        they don't??? the judge don't expalin the consequenses of charges before the trial starts? -- nm - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 08:00 4
        
        [deleted] 3
        
        but they do know the carges and the possible sentences? - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 08:14 2
        
        [deleted] 1
        
        i don't think thats the case here - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 08:23
        
        honest question: how familiar are you with what you're talking about (casey anthony)? -- nm - TFox Jul 7, 07:48 4
        
        read a few articles but the cas itself is not the real question - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 07:51 3
        
        i think you maybe don't appreciate what the "lying to police" charges entail in this case. - TFox Jul 7, 07:52 2
        
        did i say it was ? if so that was an error it was stupid and it was tried and she found gulty which i allready said - Danedukenuuk Jul 7, 07:59
        
        right, it resulted in probably thousands of man-hours wasted. -- nm - loosilu Jul 7, 07:54

Post a message top

In this case, I actually see what I think he's trying to say. Yes, she was found guilty, so she is a criminal...but I think his point was more

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.