Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 160
In response to
"
In this case, I actually see what I think he's trying to say. Yes, she was found guilty, so she is a criminal...but I think his point was more
"
by
Jim
here a charge of false statement would never be considdered in a mourder case
Posted by
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7 '11, 07:41
why waste the time of the courts with that?
Responses:
By obstructing and lying, she corrupted the entire investigation. And if she truly didn't do it...then her actions basically allowed a killer to get
-
Jim
Jul 7, 07:43
18
Why do you assume it was a murder and not accidental? -- nm
-
mara
Jul 7, 07:45
16
You must have missed the post where I said I didn't know much about the case.
-
Jim
Jul 7, 07:58
why is this important unless people want to play jury again on someone who was freed of this? -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 07:56
1
I was just asking Jim what his reasoning was. -- nm
-
mara
Jul 7, 07:58
i think people rarely get their mouths duct taped shut accidentally. -- nm
-
TFox
Jul 7, 07:46
12
I have this image of them taping her mouth shut to keep her quiet and then ignoring her while she plays by the pool. I mean, it's still "accidental"
-
Amy
Jul 7, 07:57
I guess I assumed they were trying to make it look like a murder, but maybe that doesn't make sense, since they didn't then report it. -- nm
-
mara
Jul 7, 07:48
could be post mortem.
-
loosilu
Jul 7, 07:47
9
Could be a lot of things, but you don't duct tape an accidental death for any reason that's not crazy. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Jul 7, 07:48
7
c'mon, maybe you didn't want the soul to escape the body....nm
-
x
Jul 7, 07:53
1
*squeezes through your tear ducts* -- nm
-
Casper the Friendly Ghost
Jul 7, 07:54
I totally agree. But the medical examiner could not give a conclusive cause of death.
-
loosilu
Jul 7, 07:49
Oh, I never considered these people to be mentally healthy. -- nm
-
mara
Jul 7, 07:49
3
I never thought of them as it either...but nothing here screams to me a legal mentally ill
-
Will Hunting
Jul 7, 07:51
2
No, I didn't mean legally insane. Legally sane people do irrational things. -- nm
-
mara
Jul 7, 07:54
all logic points to a murder, not a drowning. But logic != evidence.
-
loosilu
Jul 7, 07:53
well, sure. there would be no point, as dead people don't scream, but sure. -- nm
-
TFox
Jul 7, 07:48
true -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 07:44
So, really, just lie to the cops...that's not important unless they can get the murder conviction. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Jul 7, 07:42
2
if she was charged with somthing lesser it would become more important
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 07:46
talk about wasting time. how much time/money was spent because of her lies? -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 7, 07:43
how is it a waste of time? -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 7, 07:41
24
the sentence of the charge (the main charge) is way bigger then the sentence of the other
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 07:44
23
that's not at all the point. There was always the possibility that she would be found guilty of only some of the charges (as actually happened).
-
loosilu
Jul 7, 07:46
7
sure here we require the state to start a curt process if the think they can win the main charge
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 07:50
6
[deleted]
3
there are a lot of differences pointing them out is part an explanation of why i have my oppinions this is requested constantly by posters
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 08:05
2
[deleted]
1
it not critizem it is information
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 08:12
And I'm sure the prosecution here went into this thinking they had a loser. Are you kidding me? -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Jul 7, 07:52
with a trial of this size and visibility, it makes no sense to do multiple trials. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 7, 07:51
[deleted]
14
better??? hard to judge is different but in this case it seems
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 07:47
13
[deleted]
7
life in prison versus one year is the overkill point -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 07:54
6
[deleted]
5
they don't??? the judge don't expalin the consequenses of charges before the trial starts? -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 08:00
4
[deleted]
3
but they do know the carges and the possible sentences?
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 08:14
2
[deleted]
1
i don't think thats the case here
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 08:23
honest question: how familiar are you with what you're talking about (casey anthony)? -- nm
-
TFox
Jul 7, 07:48
4
read a few articles but the cas itself is not the real question
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 07:51
3
i think you maybe don't appreciate what the "lying to police" charges entail in this case.
-
TFox
Jul 7, 07:52
2
did i say it was ? if so that was an error it was stupid and it was tried and she found gulty which i allready said
-
Danedukenuuk
Jul 7, 07:59
right, it resulted in probably thousands of man-hours wasted. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 7, 07:54
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.