Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 160
In response to
"
I would imagine they wouldn't bother suing someone who doesn't have money? -- nm
"
by
loosilu
what about in 5, 10 years? it just seems like something that the banks might be able to come back and legally claim somewhere down the line.
Posted by
kare (aka kare)
Jul 18 '11, 11:52
but maybe there's a loophole i'm not aware of.
Responses:
The American people gave the banking industry how much money in bailout? And I can't get some help in return?
-
sycor
Jul 18, 11:54
1
oh i totally agree. i just can't get my brain around the idea of being able to truly walk away. -- nm
-
kare
Jul 18, 11:59
statute of limitations? I honestly don't know. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 18, 11:54
usually there's a three-year(ish) statute of limitations for bringing civil actions -- nm
-
moles
Jul 18, 11:53
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.