|
In response to
"Jack, the Paul Ryan budget would be unconstitutional under the Balanced Budget Amendment because it runs deficits"
by
Brian
|
I'm not a politicologist, but if both sides are proposing unconstitutional solutions, I have two questions:
Posted by
TFox
Jul 19 '11, 08:01
|
1) how is it unconstitutional if they're going to do it?
2) how is it a Republican problem?
|
Responses:
-
You have to be suspicious whenever a politician uses the word "uncostitutional."
-
con_carne
Jul 19, 08:09
- [deleted]
-
As the Constitution currently exists, I don't think any proposed "solutions" are unconstitutional. But the Paul Ryan plan, which the GOP (and media)
-
Don Homer
Jul 19, 08:04
-
the GOP is voting for a Balanced Budget Amendment. If they get their way, their own idea is instantly against the law of the land.
-
Will Hunting
Jul 19, 08:04
-
ideological consistency is never a prerequisite for scoring political points. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 19, 08:03
-
but the other question really is, why is it "unconstitutional" when there is no such law/amendment making it "unconstitutional" -- nm
-
tRuMaN
Jul 19, 08:02
-
isn't there a saying along the lines of "if you ra your business like the Govt you'd be bankrupt and in jail" -- nm
-
Beaker
Jul 19, 08:02
4
|