Backboards: 
Posts: 163
In response to "His behavior toward ML and Mara alone is enough to identify his purpose as negative in nature." by David

In case you sincerely do not know the whole story:

(Side remark: Jeez, this must be a slow news day, or something.. )

Funny how people criticize me (previously) for psychologising..
Facto (aka FactoFail) Jul 28 '11, 17:38
Must be the kettle calling the pot black. Well, I am sorry I made the blunder of dignifying lazy bullying posts by retorts. If you can postulate a coherent and cogent closing argument, as it were, of why I, in one day, have gone from contributor to villain, and to such a degree that you'd wish to ban me, go ahead. FYI, ML, Reagen and Mara baited for about two days, and completely without any provocations made by myself towards them. I'll provide the links if you want. Reagen: Two counts of replying to me out of nowhere, commending me on how long I lasted "this time", before revealing my natural "creepy" nature (nice words, right? ML: 4-5 counts of "I don't care" and references to me as a troll (2 counts of that) Mara: one count of baiting - but in a way that she is always prone to, whenever I am here; i.e. lazy bullying of the ones you risk the least of piling on, towards. Surely, I could've not replied. But it was a matter of reciprocality, and of provocation and retortion, nothing else. Plus I put in on a B2.. What am I even arguing this case, for.. ? Beats me.
Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.