Backboards: 
Posts: 151
In response to "figure YAC shouldn't be a factor. -- nm" by budice

So, you think the QB should only get credited with the yards between his hands and the receivers?

Because that's not a good way to measure things, but is the only way without factoring in YAC.

As an example, a QB could have the following two options:

Option A: A receiver 40 yards down field, but covered well enough that he will get tackled almost as soon as he catches the ball. And possibly intercepted or broken up.

Option B: A receiver 25 yards down field, but has beaten his coverage and has a straight shot at 20 yards easily, and probably a TD.

Throwing out YAC completely, Option A is the best option for the stat (if it isn't intercepted or broken up), but Option B is the best option for winning the game. If the stat doesn't reward the player for doing the best thing they can to win the game, the stat is worthless.


Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.