ST Alpha - "So because past voters were idiots, today's have to be too? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 162

In response to "And the argument that Ripken merited unanimous is a joke as well." by Will Hunting

So because past voters were idiots, today's have to be too? -- nm

Posted by Reagen (aka Reagen) Jan 8 '09, 16:33

(No message)

Responses:

Honestly, there's a few reasons to deny Rickey. He was not a good teammate in many cases, - Will Hunting Jan 8, 16:35 8
- if you create a baseball hall of fame and leave the alltime stolen base leader out of it, absent a Pete Rose type issue, congratulation - Reagen Jan 8, 16:36 7
  - Last time I checked, SB's aren't all that important. - Will Hunting Jan 8, 16:40 4
    - Anyone who is obviously *obviously* a hall of famer should be unanimous, because to not vote for him reveals that you are a moron. - TFox Jan 8, 16:43 3
      - Sorry, but the veterans committee has that niche well covered. -- nm - the liioulu with somthing else Jan 8, 16:45
      - The NFL Hall of Fame makes fewer mistakes because there are fewer people that vote. - Redmond on a BLT Thursday Jan 8, 16:44
      - Word. -- nm - Jim Jan 8, 16:44
  - I think Will is only talking about First Ballot. -- nm - Redmond on a BLT Thursday Jan 8, 16:38 1
    - Yeah, I don't think there's a question he'll get in, it's more when or by how much. - the liioulu with somthing else Jan 8, 16:41

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.