ST Alpha - "Last time I checked, SB's aren't all that important." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 162

In response to "if you create a baseball hall of fame and leave the alltime stolen base leader out of it, absent a Pete Rose type issue, congratulation" by Reagen

Last time I checked, SB's aren't all that important.

Posted by Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz) Jan 8 '09, 16:40

if this writer wants to make a point about the farce this is, by all means, do so. For a guy who's not got negatives like attitude, and lack of dominance over his career.

he gives 4-5 names of non-unanimous.

i'm a huge Ripken fan, he deserved to be unanimous in no manner, he had many negatives for justification.

it's a shitty article written by a guy who wants to take a shot at old media without ever pondering the why. It's a hatchet job.

Responses:

Anyone who is obviously *obviously* a hall of famer should be unanimous, because to not vote for him reveals that you are a moron. - TFox Jan 8, 16:43 3
- Sorry, but the veterans committee has that niche well covered. -- nm - the liioulu with somthing else Jan 8, 16:45
- The NFL Hall of Fame makes fewer mistakes because there are fewer people that vote. - Redmond on a BLT Thursday Jan 8, 16:44
- Word. -- nm - Jim Jan 8, 16:44

Post a message top

Last time I checked, SB's aren't all that important.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.