I may be alone on this (or not): the Irene media issue I took issue with was not the amount of coverage, but the tone of some coverage.
Posted by
ty97
Aug 30 '11, 10:18
|
Covering it near 24/7? It's a major news event and will impact people. I take no issue.
Putting people on the coast days before storm arrival? Seems a little unnecessary, but it's your budget. No issue there.
It's the media outlets (or media personalities) that played up the "be afraid and stay tuned" angle to up ratings. And there most certainly was some of that. There is quite a line between warning people a storm is dangerous and the fear-mongering that *some* media was partaking in.
I don't know what word you want to use to describe that, but it's what I took issue with (and I think I posted about this pre-Irene landfall FWIW)
|
Responses:
|