ST Alpha - "White House agrees to move joint session to Thursday. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

White House agrees to move joint session to Thursday. -- nm

Posted by Ender (aka Ender) Aug 31 '11, 19:08

(No message)

Responses:

it's because the growing in the White House garden is not ready to harvest -- nm - peglegpete Aug 31, 20:17 1
- pot growing.... -- nm - peglegpete Aug 31, 20:18
I'm just coming into this now, but why isn't this the obvious course of action? -- nm - nubby Aug 31, 19:32 6
- [deleted] 5
  - Though the president's also usually consulted with Congress before announcing it too. -- nm - Ender Aug 31, 19:43
  - Has any President tried to schedule a joint session on a debate night? - nubby Aug 31, 19:40 3
    - [deleted] 2
      - *Marge groan* -- nm - nubby Aug 31, 19:44 1
        
        "Sorry, committee meeting that day. ... Nope, that day too. And the day after that. We're pretty much working every day we're working, so..." -- nm - Max Aug 31, 19:59
seriously? -- nm - loosilu Aug 31, 19:23 23
- "the childish behavior coming out of the speaker's office today is truly historic." -- nm - David Aug 31, 19:32 21
  - hey, at least he took his call this time -- nm - moles Aug 31, 19:58
  - says an unnamed Dem aide... - Stephen Aug 31, 19:55 13
    - It's someone directly involved. They would know, no matter their politics. - David Aug 31, 20:00 12
      - Ah, so we're operating in make believe land where politics never play a part in shaping statements, and where Obama's team had no idea there was a GOP - Stephen Aug 31, 20:06 3
        
        What does that have to do with the petulance of the speaker's office? - David Aug 31, 20:21 2
        
        Because you're only seeing petulance on the speaker's part... - Stephen Aug 31, 20:24 1
        
        The Speaker's office has that track record. - David Aug 31, 20:30
      - How does being "involved" make a person of one party unbiased about the other party? -- nm - Ender Aug 31, 20:02 7
        
        I said involved. He said unbiased. -- nm - David Aug 31, 20:19 6
        
        "It's someone involved. They would know no matter their politics" - Stephen Aug 31, 20:22 5
        
        They Would k -- nm - David Aug 31, 20:23 4
        
        Now. How is this even up for debate? - David Aug 31, 20:24 3
        
        What would they know? Don't you think the political hacks on both sides are saying the other side's being childish? -- nm - Ender Aug 31, 20:30
        
        Because no Dem aide would ever make a politically motivated statement to make the other party look bad... - Stephen Aug 31, 20:29 1
        
        The first sentence of that I'm is how I feel about this entire discussion. -- nm - David Aug 31, 20:31
  - and yet, Obama gave in. -- nm - loosilu Aug 31, 19:40 5
    - I don't know why they wouldn't but I seem to have a different take on this than everyone else. - David Aug 31, 19:52 4
      - "Huh. The GOP asked for something and Obama gave it to them. Again." -- nm - Moderates Aug 31, 20:10 1
        
        Exactly. - David Aug 31, 20:24
      - I just don't remember this shit happening before. and I am an Obama supporter. - loosilu Aug 31, 20:04 1
        
        It hasn't. -- nm - David Aug 31, 20:23
- - -- (link) - Ender Aug 31, 19:26
Girls, girls! You're both pretty (awful). -- nm - Qale Aug 31, 19:21
[deleted] 2
- heh -- nm - Beaker Aug 31, 19:15 1
  - reminds me of the French debate in the Canadian election...which they moved cause of a hockey game... -- nm - Beaker Aug 31, 19:22
I can't wait to read on HuffPo about how weak Obama is. -- nm - spamlet (iPhone) Aug 31, 19:09 2
- do you think Dubya would have caved? -- nm - loosilu Aug 31, 19:24
- http://my.barackobama.com/Time-To-Act -- nm - David Aug 31, 19:12

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.