Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 18:15
2: Dec 10, 12:28
3: Dec 10, 09:30
4: Dec 10, 05:59
5: Dec 9, 17:07
6: Dec 9, 13:47
7: Dec 9, 10:33
8: Dec 9, 07:33
9: Dec 8, 17:50
10: Dec 8, 10:32
11: Dec 8, 06:23
12: Dec 7, 16:52
13: Dec 7, 07:17
14: Dec 6, 14:40
15: Dec 6, 10:07
16: Dec 6, 07:32
17: Dec 5, 19:48
18: Dec 5, 12:51
19: Dec 5, 10:39
20: Dec 5, 07:07
Posts: 153
In response to
"
How does being "involved" make a person of one party unbiased about the other party? -- nm
"
by
Ender
I said involved. He said unbiased. -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Aug 31 '11, 20:19
(No message)
Responses:
"It's someone involved. They would know no matter their politics"
-
Stephen
Aug 31, 20:22
5
They Would k -- nm
-
David
Aug 31, 20:23
4
Now. How is this even up for debate?
-
David
Aug 31, 20:24
3
What would they know? Don't you think the political hacks on both sides are saying the other side's being childish? -- nm
-
Ender
Aug 31, 20:30
Because no Dem aide would ever make a politically motivated statement to make the other party look bad...
-
Stephen
Aug 31, 20:29
1
The first sentence of that I'm is how I feel about this entire discussion. -- nm
-
David
Aug 31, 20:31
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
