Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 08:21
2: Dec 1, 17:33
3: Dec 1, 11:23
4: Nov 30, 15:54
5: Nov 30, 09:41
6: Nov 29, 16:44
7: Nov 29, 08:01
8: Nov 28, 16:19
9: Nov 28, 09:42
10: Nov 27, 18:07
11: Nov 27, 12:04
12: Nov 27, 08:26
13: Nov 26, 18:06
14: Nov 26, 12:05
15: Nov 26, 08:29
16: Nov 25, 18:33
17: Nov 25, 11:12
18: Nov 25, 07:08
19: Nov 24, 13:17
20: Nov 23, 18:13
Posts: 167
In response to
"
actually it has nothing to do with that -- nm
"
by
Danedukenuuk
that makes no sense. -- nm
Posted by
loosilu (aka loosilu2)
Sep 6 '11, 08:16
(No message)
Responses:
I believe GM plants/foods are considered intellectual property by the likes of Monsanto, with all the rights and restrictions that implies -- nm
-
con_carne
Sep 6, 08:21
3
yes and if you unwillingly and unknowingly have GMP crops in your area Monsanto will demand you pay them compensation -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Sep 6, 08:22
2
Which is problematic, since crops are usually outdoors, and pollen and seeds get carried around naturally by nature. -- nm
-
con_carne
Sep 6, 08:46
1
yes but now you can make monsanto pay for damages it's patented gene crops do to other farmers
-
Danedukenuuk
Sep 6, 08:48
ofcourse it does
-
Danedukenuuk
Sep 6, 08:19
1
Your hysterical anti-GMO post doesn't really back up your claim that it has nothing to do with anti-GMO hysteria. -- nm
-
Ender
Sep 6, 08:48
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
