Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 23:59
2: Dec 11, 14:43
3: Dec 11, 11:29
4: Dec 11, 07:59
5: Dec 10, 18:15
6: Dec 10, 12:28
7: Dec 10, 09:30
8: Dec 10, 05:59
9: Dec 9, 17:07
10: Dec 9, 13:47
11: Dec 9, 10:33
12: Dec 9, 07:33
13: Dec 8, 17:50
14: Dec 8, 10:32
15: Dec 8, 06:23
16: Dec 7, 16:52
17: Dec 7, 07:17
18: Dec 6, 14:40
19: Dec 6, 10:07
20: Dec 6, 07:32
Posts: 152
In response to
"
The article didn't read that way. That makes more sense. The article (granted I only skimmed it) made it sound like the jury made the verdict and then
"
by
sycor
It said the phrase "Court of Appeal", what more do you need? :) -- nm
Posted by
Beryllium (aka grayman)
Sep 9 '11, 14:32
(No message)
Responses:
I was referring more the "but last May the province's highest court decided the jury made a mistake." I thought the Court of Appeal was something that
-
sycor
Sep 9, 14:35
5
Highest Court is the province's supreme court, usually. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Sep 9, 14:36
4
makes sense. You crazy Canadians and your strange terminology. -- nm
-
sycor
Sep 9, 14:37
1
[deleted]
so it goes regular trial->appeal->supreme court of the province, then if things get really hairy it gets kicked around some more
-
Beryllium
Sep 9, 14:37
1
[deleted]
*rereads* Hmm. Queen's Bench is an unusual term, I'll grant you that. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Sep 9, 14:34
1
Alberta Court of Appeal is mentioned in next to last graph. -- nm
-
the liioulu weith stray e
Sep 9, 14:37
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
