Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 151
In response to
"
Washington State is considering a new policy: "Emergency room visits in the Medicaid program will be limited to three non-emergent visits per year."
"
by
James Bond (aka Igor)
One problem. If you have three during the year are they going to send you away for a stab wound? -- nm
Posted by
Bacon (aka redmond)
Sep 12 '11, 18:08
(No message)
Responses:
a stab wound is emergent. the follow up wound check would not be -- nm
-
dogbert
Sep 12, 18:15
4
For that I'd expect them to be directed to urgent care. -- nm
-
Ender
Sep 12, 18:45
1
the people who actually abuse the system don't follow up as they are directed to. a wound check also isn't emergent or urgent, but the abusers will
-
dogbert
Sep 12, 18:59
Is everyone misspelling "emergency" or am I learning a new meaning for the word "emergent"? -- nm
-
TWuG
Sep 12, 18:22
1
new meaning. -- nm
-
loosilu
Sep 12, 18:53
That would be an emergent case and thus wouldn't fall under the 3 non-emergent limit. -- nm
-
Ender
Sep 12, 18:12
Naw, the hospital will just get screwed. -- nm
-
James Bond (aka Igor)
Sep 12, 18:09
Lawsuit waiting to happen. Good in theory, they won't enforce it. -- nm
-
Epphany
Sep 12, 18:09
4
The laws already exist where you can't turn people away from ERs -- nm
-
James Bond (aka Igor)
Sep 12, 18:09
3
So conflicting laws -- nm
-
Epiphany
Sep 12, 18:19
2
I think the end result will just mean the hospitals get screwed. Because people will still go to ERs and then not pay. You can't turn people away. -- nm
-
James Bond (aka Igor)
Sep 12, 18:26
1
and eventually they will shut down their emergency rooms because it looses too much money and people with emergencys are screwed -- nm
-
dogbert
Sep 12, 18:28
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.