Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 158
the answer is simple. there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in public. there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in private, which is why
Posted by
Max
Sep 13 '11, 11:06
they need a warrant to conduct searches.
Responses:
[deleted]
6
No, that's what's funny. In doing genealogy you get a real sense that there was no damn privacy.
-
Max
Sep 13, 11:13
5
[deleted]
4
but they aren't opening the car, just placing something on it. The police do search mail if they think it is an explosive or drugs don't they? -- nm
-
Beaker
Sep 13, 11:19
2
[deleted]
I can see the argument that attaching something to the car might be seen to unreasonably violate the integrity of personal property
-
znufrii
Sep 13, 11:20
are they looking in the car or just tracking its movements on public roads? there's a big difference there. -- nm
-
Max
Sep 13, 11:18
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.