Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 12, 13:06
2: Dec 12, 08:55
3: Dec 11, 23:59
4: Dec 11, 14:43
5: Dec 11, 11:29
6: Dec 11, 07:59
7: Dec 10, 18:15
8: Dec 10, 12:28
9: Dec 10, 09:30
10: Dec 10, 05:59
11: Dec 9, 17:07
12: Dec 9, 13:47
13: Dec 9, 10:33
14: Dec 9, 07:33
15: Dec 8, 17:50
16: Dec 8, 10:32
17: Dec 8, 06:23
18: Dec 7, 16:52
19: Dec 7, 07:17
20: Dec 6, 14:40
Posts: 159
In response to
"
that is a lot of customers but not a huge percentage. so someone do the math - lets say half the people left agreed to the price increase?
"
by
Epiphany
I disagree -- I think any slide backwards is significant. -- nm
Posted by
amanda jones (aka amanda)
Sep 15 '11, 06:04
(No message)
Responses:
I hope its significant to them. If they were smart -they put out a price program to woo people back.
-
Epiphany
Sep 15, 06:06
2
they're not raising prices to be greedy, as content providers continue to overvalue their streaming assets Netflix doesn't have much choice
-
stewie
Sep 15, 06:14
1
" greedy" is debateable - they could have cut expenses else where? they could offer new products and bring in more business - they could have made
-
Epiphany
Sep 15, 06:32
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.