Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 153
In response to
"
Before your IM, I was about to say, that's a LOT of packs. -- nm
"
by
Tim
I went 0-4 at FNM. It was Standard format and as I've yet to really invest in that, my near rare-less deck suffered.
Posted by
Qale (aka Qale)
Oct 8 '11, 21:38
I had plenty of answers for the expected Swords I saw. But as good as Serra Angel is, she just doesn't really cut it.
Responses:
Yeah, I couldn't get the other two Stalkers I needed and my deck failed horribly.
-
Tim
Oct 8, 22:14
5
The stalkers aren't scary at all when they get their swords demystified.
-
Qale
Oct 8, 22:20
2
oblivion ring is good for stuff too. -- nm
-
Tim
Oct 8, 22:22
1
I have one. I use it. But it gets redonkulous when people are oblivion ringing oblivion rings. -- nm
-
Qale
Oct 8, 22:25
Though it seems like this is the type of deck that's about to take over.
-
Tim
Oct 8, 22:18
1
I played against this exact deck. I think net decking at FNM is for losers. -- nm
-
Qale
Oct 8, 22:27
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.