ST Alpha - "It's safe to say that, generally speaking, Republican voters give less than two sh*ts who Chris Christie endorses." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 164

It's safe to say that, generally speaking, Republican voters give less than two sh*ts who Chris Christie endorses.

Posted by con_carne Oct 11 '11, 10:39

This move will be good for a news cycle and some sound bites, I suppose.

But really, who cares?

Responses:

really? - TFox Oct 11, 10:40 10
- Chris Christie couldn't even win his own state in a Pres election, I think his importance is way too overblown. -- nm - MDH Oct 11, 10:43 9
  - I'm pretty sure that's wrong. He's pretty popular in NJ. -- nm - Chest Rockwell Oct 11, 10:57 2
    - eh -- (link) - moles Oct 11, 11:03 1
      - He's always been in the mid to high 40s, and he has a 49/33 fav unfav, which is strong for a Republican in NJ - Chest Rockwell Oct 11, 11:08
  - No. He has a nationally recognized name. And remember, when Pawlenty endorsed Romney, Perry responded w/ Jindal & - mara Oct 11, 10:50 3
    - Chris Christie's endorsement can and should matter to Republicans in New Jersey. But NJ's primary is in June. - con_carne Oct 11, 10:59 2
      - The man was being *BEGGED* to run only 10 days ago. He's important enough to the money men of the party to be important. -- nm - Will Hunting Oct 11, 11:00 1
        
        this -- nm - znufrii Oct 11, 11:00
  - Yes. He was special because he won in a blue state. And then there was something about tunnels. That's pretty much it. -- nm - con_carne Oct 11, 10:49
  - we're talking about his importance to the Republican primary race, though. -- nm - Reagen Oct 11, 10:46

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.