Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 153
In response to
"
third party! -- nm
"
by
moles
What gets me is that your system should effectively work under a multi-party system. And yet, two parties are firmly entrenched.
Posted by
Name Withheld by Request (aka BlueKopo)
Oct 12 '11, 14:58
Our system is best utilized in a two-party system, yet we have a bad habit of electing a lot of fringy parties that do nothing but complicate the workings.
Responses:
nobody can build consensus within either of the two parties. not sure how splitting them into the "moderate" and "extreme" wings would make it better -- nm
-
moles
Oct 12, 15:03
2
at the very least we could stop pretending that Bernie Sanders and Ben Nelson share anything in common. -- nm
-
Reagen
Oct 12, 15:06
1
true. but then to have a governing coalition in Congress, they'd presumably still have to work together -- nm
-
moles
Oct 12, 15:07
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.