Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 12:28
2: Dec 10, 09:30
3: Dec 10, 05:59
4: Dec 9, 17:07
5: Dec 9, 13:47
6: Dec 9, 10:33
7: Dec 9, 07:33
8: Dec 8, 17:50
9: Dec 8, 10:32
10: Dec 8, 06:23
11: Dec 7, 16:52
12: Dec 7, 07:17
13: Dec 6, 14:40
14: Dec 6, 10:07
15: Dec 6, 07:32
16: Dec 5, 19:48
17: Dec 5, 12:51
18: Dec 5, 10:39
19: Dec 5, 07:07
20: Dec 4, 18:10
Posts: 160
In response to
"
Thank God Rober Bork didn't end up on the Supreme Court (nmbl)
"
by
Brian
while I obviously dsagree, can someone explain to me what the problem with him saying being on the court would be an intellectual challenge would be? -- nm
Posted by
Reagen
Oct 18 '11, 15:12
(No message)
Responses:
[deleted]
According to WaPo - basically, his statement created the impression that he's focus on intellectual concerns, and ignore real world impacts -- (link)
-
Roger More
Oct 18, 15:30
1
(though I expect the other considerations listed in the article had more to do with his rejection) -- nm
-
Roger More
Oct 18, 15:31
(disagree with his views, that is) -- nm
-
Reagen
Oct 18, 15:13
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.