Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 5, 07:07
2: Dec 4, 18:10
3: Dec 4, 12:27
4: Dec 4, 09:36
5: Dec 4, 02:38
6: Dec 3, 14:19
7: Dec 3, 11:17
8: Dec 3, 07:33
9: Dec 2, 17:22
10: Dec 2, 11:48
11: Dec 2, 08:21
12: Dec 1, 17:33
13: Dec 1, 11:23
14: Nov 30, 15:54
15: Nov 30, 09:41
16: Nov 29, 16:44
17: Nov 29, 08:01
18: Nov 28, 16:19
19: Nov 28, 09:42
20: Nov 27, 18:07
Posts: 160
In response to
"
Thank God Rober Bork didn't end up on the Supreme Court (nmbl)
"
by
Brian
while I obviously dsagree, can someone explain to me what the problem with him saying being on the court would be an intellectual challenge would be? -- nm
Posted by
Reagen
Oct 18 '11, 15:12
(No message)
Responses:
[deleted]
According to WaPo - basically, his statement created the impression that he's focus on intellectual concerns, and ignore real world impacts -- (link)
-
Roger More
Oct 18, 15:30
1
(though I expect the other considerations listed in the article had more to do with his rejection) -- nm
-
Roger More
Oct 18, 15:31
(disagree with his views, that is) -- nm
-
Reagen
Oct 18, 15:13
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.