ST Alpha - "offs. the chances of two false positives on the same person? much less than the cases you find by screening. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 163

In response to "which might turn up another false positive. -- nm" by Zombie Liz Taylor

offs. the chances of two false positives on the same person? much less than the cases you find by screening. -- nm

Posted by zork Oct 31 '11, 08:45

(No message)

Responses:

Their point is, overaggressive treatment is more harmful than no treatment. -- nm - Zombie Liz Taylor Oct 31, 08:47 7
- It's not exactly that it's "more harmful", it's more like unnecessary. The overwhelming majority of cases of prostate cancer are so slow-growing that - Trish Oct 31, 08:57 4
  - depends on the treatment, I would imagine. - this is my costume Oct 31, 08:59 3
    - Surgery and other treatments can be harmful as well. -- nm - Zombie Liz Taylor Oct 31, 09:03 2
      - agreed. in any case, it made me sure as f*ck not want to get cancer. - this is my costume Oct 31, 09:04 1
        
        I am not sure yet about totally skipping screenings, but we have to take a careful look at whether overtesting - Zombie Liz Taylor Oct 31, 09:05
- well, that's not exactly their point. -- nm - TFox Oct 31, 08:52
- *walks away* -- nm - zork Oct 31, 08:51

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.