Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 155
I agree that they are not the same.
Posted by
Strongbad (aka Rambler14)
Nov 2 '11, 12:26
I would still call both "disrupting"
One is a 9,
the other is a 6.
Responses:
Then stop saying they are going to disrupt the Caucuses. Because, as you admit, they are not the same. -- nm
-
ty97
Nov 2, 12:27
10
"Disrupt does not mean violent." = "We're going to disrupt in a non-violent way" -- nm
-
Strongbad
Nov 2, 12:32
We'll just have to disagree.
-
Strongbad
Nov 2, 12:31
6
[deleted]
4
I have not once claimed that they are trying to interfere with the democratic process
-
Strongbad
Nov 2, 12:53
2
[deleted]
1
Not quite. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Nov 3, 06:10
Just two out of three. -- nm
-
Dr.Vermin
Nov 2, 12:47
I think "the campaigns for" and thereby "the results of" can be included in the overall descriptor "the caucuses".
-
Dr.Vermin
Nov 2, 12:34
and what style of breakfast will the Occupiers have that morning at the hotel? -- nm
-
con_carne
Nov 2, 12:29
1
....and...scene! -- nm
-
znufrii
Nov 2, 12:30
For ty, the key word is "caucus", not "disrupting" -- nm
-
Roger More
Nov 2, 12:27
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
