Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 157
In response to
"
utilize? anticipate? appreciate? recognize? -- nm
"
by
Spawn
more along the lines of "you're not permitted to use the process in this way."
Posted by
znufrii
Nov 3 '11, 10:35
of course, I could always just say that...
Responses:
Accomodate or support (both already suggested, I'm just seconding). -- nm
-
mara
Nov 3, 10:37
allow? permit? The process is not intended to accommodate requests of this nature?
-
ty97
Nov 3, 10:36
2
I think you might need the 'not intended to' because otherwise, whatever word you use, it won't be possible to tell if the process
-
ty97
Nov 3, 10:38
not the word I was looking for, but it works...
-
znufrii
Nov 3, 10:37
allow -- nm
-
Andie
Nov 3, 10:35
3
or authorize -- nm
-
David
Nov 3, 10:35
2
"This is not an authorized request." -- nm
-
Andie
Nov 3, 10:37
1
"You're doing it wrong." -- nm
-
znufrii
Nov 3, 10:42
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.