Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 153
In response to
"
SITWAP: Man sues wedding photographer for $48,000, 8 years after his wedding -- (link)
"
by
Strongbad
But Hot Coffee taught me that there was no such thing as frivilous lawsuits anymore!
Posted by
Name Withheld By Request (aka BlueKopo)
Nov 3 '11, 11:10
I keed.
Responses:
If (I stress if) the contract for wedding photography included pictures of the last dance and bouquet toss, is that not breach of contract?
-
ty97
Nov 3, 11:17
7
8 years after the fact? -- nm
-
Strongbad
Nov 3, 11:18
6
Does breach of contract have a statute of limitations (I don't know the answer to that) -- nm
-
ty97
Nov 3, 11:19
5
6 years -- (link)
-
decline
Nov 3, 11:21
1
The NYT said he sued just before the statute of limitations was about to expire -- nm
-
Roger More
Nov 3, 11:22
a year or two? fraud is six or 7 years???? -- nm
-
zeitgeist
Nov 3, 11:19
1
Since a judge let the case go ahead, I'm guessing not, but it's not a topic I'm clear on. -- nm
-
ty97
Nov 3, 11:21
No idea. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Nov 3, 11:19
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
