ST Alpha - "Contracts for wedding photography do not typically specify which photos will be taken, usually just how long a photog will be on site and how many " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "SITWAP: Man sues wedding photographer for $48,000, 8 years after his wedding -- (link)" by Strongbad

Contracts for wedding photography do not typically specify which photos will be taken, usually just how long a photog will be on site and how many

Posted by zeitgeist Nov 3 '11, 11:16

prints/sizes. and I can't imagine not having a clause that says any failure or ommission claim is limited to any payment/deposit paid, so whatever the guy paid for the package should be all that he can sue for. this clause standard on even quickie preprinted contracts from NEBS.

Responses:

I'm not sure clauses like that always stand up - ty97 Nov 3, 11:21 3
- most wedding/video contracts say photog will be here at this time, there till x PM - zeitgeist Nov 3, 11:27 2
  - Sure, that's what the explicit contract says. - ty97 Nov 3, 11:29 1
    - contracts offered by the vendor tend to weigh heavily on the vendor's side. though in your senario that would be misrepresentation to the point of - zeitgeist Nov 3, 11:38

Post a message top

Contracts for wedding photography do not typically specify which photos will be taken, usually just how long a photog will be on site and how many

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.