ST Alpha - "Ok, sure, it's a surprise eight years later. I mean the lawsuit itself isn't frivolous or bizarre (the damage request is) -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "A lawsuit for this, after eight years, is left field IMO -- nm" by Roger More

Ok, sure, it's a surprise eight years later. I mean the lawsuit itself isn't frivolous or bizarre (the damage request is) -- nm

Posted by ty97 Nov 3 '11, 11:18

(No message)

Responses:

Maybe the breach of contract part, no. Looks like he also sued for 'infliction of emotional distress' (yes). - Dr.Vermin Nov 3, 11:22 6
- It sounds like the judge is handling it well, actually. -- nm - ty97 Nov 3, 11:23 5
  - unless your the photographer who has already racked up $50k in legal bills (so he says) -- nm - decline Nov 3, 11:24 4
    - The judges job it to work according to the law, not to limit the photographer's legal bills. - ty97 Nov 3, 11:27 3
      - Legislators, judges... no lawyer culpability in this equation? -- nm - Dr.Vermin Nov 3, 11:32 1
        
        What lawyer culpability do you see? I didn't read any claims of misconduct. - ty97 Nov 3, 11:37
      - IF the studio was members of PPA (pro photogs of america) they would have indemnity coverage for failures and ommissions and a law firm well versed in - zeitgeist Nov 3, 11:30

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.