Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 153
In response to
"
It sounds like the judge is handling it well, actually. -- nm
"
by
ty97
unless your the photographer who has already racked up $50k in legal bills (so he says) -- nm
Posted by
decline (aka Decline)
Nov 3 '11, 11:24
(No message)
Responses:
The judges job it to work according to the law, not to limit the photographer's legal bills.
-
ty97
Nov 3, 11:27
3
Legislators, judges... no lawyer culpability in this equation? -- nm
-
Dr.Vermin
Nov 3, 11:32
1
What lawyer culpability do you see? I didn't read any claims of misconduct.
-
ty97
Nov 3, 11:37
IF the studio was members of PPA (pro photogs of america) they would have indemnity coverage for failures and ommissions and a law firm well versed in
-
zeitgeist
Nov 3, 11:30
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.