ST Alpha - "we had been promised temp work wouldn't hurt us. then they turned around, and *chop*. It was in 2002. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

In response to "*shrug* -- nm" by znufrii

we had been promised temp work wouldn't hurt us. then they turned around, and chop. It was in 2002. -- nm

Posted by loosilu (aka loosilu2) Nov 3 '11, 12:20

(No message)

Responses:

but, how many days a week were you working? was it a mon-fri temp job? -- nm - Andie Nov 3, 12:24 8
- It was Monday to Friday, but I was spitting the hours with someone, so neither of us ever had 40. -- nm - loosilu Nov 3, 12:25 7
  - so, it was the fact that you were working, not the fact that you signed up for a temp agency, which made you not get benefits. - znufrii Nov 3, 12:30 3
    - Here's what they said. Because I was signed up at the agency, I would have to PROVE that I called the agency every day to inquire whether there was - loosilu Nov 3, 12:31 2
      - nowadays, all you have to do is send in your resume to their online job bank, you don't have to prove you looked for sh!t. -- nm - znufrii Nov 3, 12:32 1
        
        oh, that's exactly what we were told at the start. - loosilu Nov 3, 12:36
  - (not that it should have mattered, we were promised a temp job wouldn't hurt our UI eligibility) -- nm - loosilu Nov 3, 12:26 2
    - i get that, but, if i'm working 36 hours a week at a temp job, i really don't think i should be getting my UI money on top of that. - Andie Nov 3, 12:28 1
      - I didn't. I mean, when that job ended, I was no longer eligible for UI, even though they promised I would be. -- nm - loosilu Nov 3, 12:29

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.