|
In response to
"Umm, that 2008..2010 thing is kind of mystifying. It doesn't work, Google just thinks the numbers are search terms. -- nm"
by
mara
|
They probably needed to describe it better. I initially though it would look for articles from that date range
Posted by
ty97
Dec 1 '11, 08:13
|
but rather, it highlights articles that have 2008, 2009, or 2010 in them. Which can be useful, but was not what I was intuitively expecting
|
Responses:
|