ST Alpha - "I'd way rather have 10/50. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 168

In response to "I am on the fence with Trout." by groiny

I'd way rather have 10/50. -- nm

Posted by TFox Dec 1 '11, 13:50

(No message)

Responses:

[deleted] 10
- fyi, here are how I initially rank them.... - groiny Dec 1, 13:56 9
  - Any system that has Ellsbury that low is deeply flawed either via scoring or scouting. - Will Hunting Dec 1, 14:06
  - [deleted] 6
    - *ML* thinks you're overthinking this. M. L. -- nm - TFox Dec 1, 13:58 5
      - well, my first selection is #3, so I do not expect to land him anyway. nm -- nm - groiny Dec 1, 14:00 3
        
        no, that's true. that's like a "i want to feel better about not landing him" ranking. -- nm - TFox Dec 1, 14:00 2
        
        but if he does fall to 3 and you *don't* take him, i will never respect you again. -- nm - TFox Dec 1, 14:02 1
        
        well, I fully expect him to go #1 and Pineda to go #2 based on conversations - groiny Dec 1, 14:04
      - [deleted]
  - 14 for Ellsbury? You're on weed smoke. -- nm - TFox Dec 1, 13:57
for strict fantasy purposes, yes. This is geared more for OPS. - groiny Dec 1, 13:51 3
- yeah, if you have weird scoring (don't make me rant again about my hatred for weird scoring) then our ranks will be marginally useless. -- nm - TFox Dec 1, 13:52 2
  - at least he's not using Don Homer's naming algorithm. -- nm - loosilu Dec 1, 13:54
  - not really.... - groiny Dec 1, 13:53

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.