I'm (predictably) troubled by the idea that the gov't is supposed to be the ultimate audience for all public speech...
Posted by
Dr.Vermin (aka Dr.Vermin)
Dec 2 '11, 11:24
|
Or that the speech protection is solely/mainly designed to protect the channel of communication running from public to gov't.
Whereas I always imagined it to be protecting the public-to-public speech talking *about* the gov't. Which may be splitting hairs.
Or I may be generally misreading. :)
|
Responses:
|