|
In response to
"Jays/Yankees/Red Sox all after Matt Garza from the Cubs -- (link)"
by
Beaker
|
I just don't understand the Cubs interest in dealing him. We need pitching. Why would you trade your best pitcher.
Posted by
pmb (aka pmb)
Dec 30 '11, 12:04
|
I get that they want to stockpile prospects and maybe it makes sense if you view this as a 3-5 yr. horizon before you get competitive again, but I hope they aren't thinking that way entirely.
|
Responses:
-
I think they'll need to be overpaid for him somewhat. I don't think they'll trade him no matter what. -- nm
-
TFox, Vamp Champ
Dec 30, 12:05
3
-
Right, what happened with the Padres/Reds deal is that every team has to be at least explore opportunities. -- nm
-
David
Dec 30, 12:07
2
-
especially when the pitching market gets this thin. There's Oswalt, Kiroda, and then Maholm, and then...?
-
TFox, Vamp Champ
Dec 30, 12:12
-
So, have you reconsidered our offer of Adam Jones for Jurrjens, Prado, Heyward, Teheran, Minor and Chipper's HOF hat? -- nm
-
Orioles
Dec 30, 12:11
|