In response to
"but, if you report a someone making a direct statment, that you KNOW is erroneous, and say nothing... -- nm"
by
Andie
|
I understand the theory. I question whether the NYT would be able to pull it off in a factual non-partisan way.
Posted by
Strongbad (aka Rambler14)
Jan 13 '12, 07:41
|
For example, from the link.
"Any assertion that he has apologized for U.S. actions rests on a misleading interpretation of the president�s words"
It's the NYT's opinion that this interpretation is misleading. This is not a case of 1 person saying the Sky is Orange when in reality the Sky is Blue.
|
Responses:
|