Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 153
In response to
"
And the flip side of that is the you can apologize for something without using the word "apologize" in a sentence.
"
by
Strongbad
fine, that was an example used in the article. but you could apply the same approach to anything. -- nm
Posted by
Andie (aka Andie)
Jan 13 '12, 07:50
(No message)
Responses:
In theory, I fully support it. I question the NYT's ability to implement it. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Jan 13, 07:52
3
The debate is not about the NYT, it's about journalism in general -- nm
-
Guigue
Jan 13, 07:53
(and I apologize for jumping around with my stance)
-
Strongbad
Jan 13, 07:53
1
enh, that's what debate is for. :) -- nm
-
Andie
Jan 13, 07:59
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.